Axillary Lymphadenopathy After Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccinations in Patients With Thoracic Malignancy: Incidence, Predisposing Factors, and Imaging Characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: Axillary lymphadenopathy from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is an emerging phenomenon during unprecedented mass vaccinations, which can be incidentally found on computed tomography (CT) scans. This study investigated the incidence, predisposing factors, and imaging characteristics of vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy in patients with thoracic malignancy who underwent CT scans before and after COVID-19 vaccinations. METHODS: The study included patients with thoracic malignancies who received two doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccinations and had prevaccine and postvaccine chest CT scans. Postvaccine chest CT scan results were reviewed for increase in size of lymph nodes in the axilla and subpectoral areas, comparing with the prevaccine scan results. The cases with lymphadenopathy were further reviewed independently by two radiologists referring to clinical information to find whether lymphadenopathy was attributed to the vaccinations. RESULTS: Vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy was noted in 21 of 232 patients (9.0%). The median short-axis diameter of the largest node was 7 mm (range: 5-14 mm). The median number of increased nodes was 4 (range: 1-10). The median time to the postvaccine scan revealing lymphadenopathy was 1.7 weeks (range: -2.9 to 6.6) from the second dose. Vaccine-related lymphadenopathy was noted more often in women than in men (18 of 144, 12.5% versus 3 of 88, 3.4%, respectively; p = 0.019) and with mRNA-1273 vaccines than BNT162b2 vaccines (6 of 28, 21% versus 15 of 204, 7.4%, respectively; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of lymphadenopathy was 9%, with a median onset time of 1.7 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Female sex and vaccine type (mRNA-1273 vaccine) were associated with higher frequency of lymphadenopathy, providing initial observations to inform further investigations in larger cohorts.

Radiation Recall Pneumonitis on FDG PET/CT Triggered by COVID-19 Vaccination.

ABSTRACT: A 67-year-old man with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma was initially treated with whole-brain radiotherapy for intracranial metastases, followed by chemotherapy and pembrolizumab. After completing 2 years of systemic therapy, the primary right lung lesion was biopsy-proven to have residual adenocarcinoma, which was then treated with radiation (6000 cGy in 15 fractions). Follow-up serial FDG PET/CT showed radiation fibrosis. Eighteen months after radiotherapy, the patient received 2 doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. FDG PET/CT performed 4 days following his second vaccine dose showed FDG-avid multistation lymphadenopathy and radiation recall pneumonitis, likely vaccination-induced and mimicking recurrent disease. This resolved spontaneously without therapy.

Care disruptions among patients with lung cancer: A COVID-19 and cancer outcomes study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with lung cancer (LC) are susceptible to severe outcomes from COVID-19. This study evaluated disruption to care of patients with LC during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The COVID-19 and Cancer Outcomes Study (CCOS) is a prospective cohort study comprised of patients with a current or past history of hematological or solid malignancies with outpatient visits between March 2 and March 6, 2020, at two academic cancer centers in the Northeastern United States (US). Data was collected for the three months prior to the index week (baseline period) and the following three months (pandemic period). RESULTS: 313 of 2365 patients had LC, 1578 had other solid tumors, and 474 had hematological malignancies. Patients with LC were not at increased risk of COVID-19 diagnosis compared to patients with other solid or hematological malignancies. When comparing data from the pandemic period to the baseline period, patients with LC were more likely to have a decrease in in-person visits compared to patients with other solid tumors (aOR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.46-2.58), but without an increase in telehealth visits (aOR 1.13; 95% CI 0.85-1.50). Patients with LC were more likely to experience pandemic-related treatment delays than patients with other solid tumors (aOR 1.80; 95% CI 1.13-2.80) and were more likely to experience imaging/diagnostic procedure delays than patients with other solid tumors (aOR 2.59; 95% CI, 1.46-4.47) and hematological malignancies (aOR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.02-3.93). Among patients on systemic therapy, patients with LC were also at increased risk for decreased in-person visits and increased treatment delays compared to those with other solid tumors. DISCUSSION: Patients with LC experienced increased cancer care disruption compared to patients with other malignancies during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Focused efforts to ensure continuity of care for this patient population are warranted.